UK Government Responds To Parliamentary Question On UFO Policy

The debate around Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) has gained a huge amount of traction and press attention internationally, particularly in the United States, where whistleblower testimonies and reports of unidentified drones above military bases have dominated headlines. Here in the UK, little has been said on the topic, until this week when a question was raised in the House of Commons.

David Reed, the Conservative MP for Exmouth and Exeter East, submitted a formal query to the Secretary of State for Defence. Parliamentary written questions like this allow Members of Parliament to request information on the work, policy, and activities of government departments.

Reed asked, "To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what his Department's policy is on reporting Unidentified Aerial Phenomena; and whether new material has been classified on the subject since the UK's declassification programme." This inquiry, raised during a time of heightened international concern, aimed to clarify the UK's position.

The response to Reed's question came on December 11 from Labour MP Luke Pollard, representing Plymouth Sutton. In his reply, Pollard stated that the Ministry of Defence (MOD) has maintained a consistent position on UAPs over the last five decades. He began by stating that "in over 50 years, no sighting reported to the Department has indicated the existence of any military threat to the United Kingdom." This assertion reinforces the MOD's view that UAPs do not warrant immediate investigation.

Pollard's statement also clarified that the MOD ceased its investigations into UAPs in 2009. At that time, it was determined that dedicating staff to such efforts was not the best use of resources. Instead, the MOD chose to reallocate its personnel to other defence-related priorities. Pollard noted, "It has been deemed more valuable to prioritise MOD staff towards other Defence-related activities."

Another key point in the response was the assurance that no new material on UAPs has been classified since the closure of investigations in 2009. This aligns with the UK's declassification programme, through which all MOD files related to UFOs up until 2009 were made publicly available at The National Archives. By stating that "all MOD files relating to UFOs that were created up until 2009 have been released to The National Archives (TNA)," Pollard underscored the MOD's commitment to transparency in handling historical data on UAPs.

Looking to the future, Pollard's response made it clear that the MOD has no plans to establish a dedicated team to investigate alleged sightings. This stands in stark contrast to the United States, where entities such as the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) have been formed to actively investigate UAPs. While acknowledging the "differing approaches currently being undertaken by other countries and allies," Pollard's response reaffirmed that the UK's measured stance remains unchanged.

Luke Pollard's Full Response from Pollard reads:

The UK's reaction to UAPs has consistently been more restrained compared to the US. While American officials have increased funding for investigations and held public hearings, the UK's MOD has chosen to focus on other defence priorities. This measured approach has drawn criticism from some UFO researchers, who argue that the lack of dedicated resources might reflect a dismissal of an important issue.

Pollard's response also highlighted the "differing approaches" taken by other nations. In the United States, the establishment of specialised offices and the release of previously classified footage signify a more transparent and investigative attitude. In contrast, the UK's static stance since 2009 underscores a cultural and strategic divergence.

The parliamentary written questions platform plays a crucial role in ensuring transparency, enabling MPs and Lords to question government departments on their policies and activities. The MOD's response, while clear, raises broader questions about whether the UK is adequately engaging with the evolving global discourse on UAPs.

As international interest in UAPs continues to grow, the UK's reserved stance will likely remain a topic of debate. For some, it represents rational prioritisation of resources. For others, it appears as a missed opportunity to contribute meaningfully to a subject of growing global intrigue.